Price: On Request
Model 2553 allows for experiments where a large compliance potential is required, along with stability of the measurement and long-time reliability. The new version offers positive feedback control, fast transient response, automatic or manual current ranging and IR compensation.
Get pricing and product details from AMEL.
Instrument Type
Potentiostat/Galvanostat
Weight
15 kg
Power supply
115 or 230 V AC ±10%, 50/60 Hz
Power Consumption
80 VA max
Dimensions
440 × 400 × 145 mm
Max. channels
1
Instrument architecture
Single-channel
PC connection details
USB
Cell connection
4 electrode, 3 electrode, 2 electrode
ADC resolution
16 bit
Memory
EEPROM 64kB – SRAM 32kB
Input impedance
> 1 TΩ
Digital-to-Analog Converters
16 bit
Input Capacitance
< 20 pF (1m cable)
Protection
Thermal, overload and short-circuit
Port Output
8 external accessory
I/O port
8 optional
DC hardware sampling
200 µs
Temperature measurement
Yes (PT1000, 0 to 100 °C)
Common-mode rejection
> 60 dB full frequency response
Input Bias Current
< 10 pA at 25 °C
Form factor
Benchtop
Applied potential resolution
100 μV
Min. Voltage resolution (output) / μV
100
Applied potential accuracy
± 0,2% & 0,1% (conversion at Full Scale)
Voltage Ranges
± 10V max or ± 50V max
Slew rate
0,01mV/s to 10V/s
iR positive-feedback resistance range
2Ω to 100MΩ (depending on current range)
Potential range
±10 V
Compliance voltage
±45 V
Max. current (output) / A
±1 A
Current measurement ranges
9 ranges, ±10 nA to ±1 A
Min. Current Resolution (output) / pA
10
Measured current accuracy
< 1% of Full Scale in 10nA to 1μA ranges < 0,25% of Full Scale in 10μA to 1A range
Measured current resolution
From 10pA at 10nA F.S. to 100μA at 1A F.S.
Min. Current Resolution (input) / pA
10
EIS configuration
Not available
0 global ratings
Verified Identity
Every review undergoes an email verification process to ensure it originates from a verified industry professional.
Verified Purchase
We manually validate "Verified Purchase" claims by cross-referencing with supplier records or identifying the equipment in peer-reviewed scientific publications.
Transparent Publishing
All verified reviews, whether positive or negative, are published without bias as long as they comply with our community guidelines.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Share your experience with this product.
Scientific publications where researchers have utilized this equipment.Are you an author? Contact us to add your research.
Sara Scolari, Davide Mombelli, Gianluca Dall’Osto, Carlo Mapelli • Biomass and Bioenergy, 210 (2026) 109151
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2026.109151(opens in a new tab)
Price on request
Price on request
Price on request
Price on request
Price on request
Price on request
Price on request
Price on request
Price on request
Price on request